![]() Semiotica e linguaggio nella scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. Roger Bacon on the Significatum of words. de Rijk (Eds.), English logic and semantics: From the end of the twelfth century to the time of Ockham and Burleigh (pp. Roger Bacon on ‘Impositio vocis ad significandum’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46(3), 365–394.įredborg, Karin Margareta. An intensional interpretation of Ockham’s theory of supposition. Dordrecht: Springer.ĭutilh Novaes, Catarina. Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes. Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage, 8(2), 63–79.ĭutilh Novaes, Catarina. Intention de signifier et engendrement du discours chez Roger Bacon. Hackett (Ed.), Roger Bacon & the sciences (pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ĭe Libera, Alain. (Eds.), Relations in medieval logic and semantics. Roger Bacon’s relational theory of the sign and its implications. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 53, 139–289.īacon, Roger. ![]() de Libera (Ed.), Les Summulae dialectices de Roger Bacon. Pinborg (Eds.), An unedited part of Roger Bacon’s ‘Opus Maius’. Biard (Ed.), Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe (pp. ‘Nulla propositio est distinguenda’: La notion d’equivocatio chez Albert de Saxe. This paper will rely on Claude Panaccio’s work on Ockham’s semantics and attempt to show that, in spite of the considerable differences that oppose the two theories, they share some fundamental ideas about the speakers’ involvement in the semantic processes. On the pragmatic side and a few decades before Ockham, we would find Roger Bacon and his attempt to translate supposition theory into an intensional semantics of signification, so that the central importance of speakers is better described. On the semantic side, we would find William of Ockham and his apparent willingness to propose a system that seeks to determine sentences’ truth conditions as formally as possible. ![]() If we were to place the different positions on an axis stretching from the most semantic to the most pragmatic, William of Ockham and Roger Bacon would likely occupy the two extremes. This role varies in importance from one logician to another. While supposition theory is perhaps the closest thing medieval logicians have to a formal approach to semantics, it grants speakers a role.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |